I think the two key points to remember from this week's readings are the definition of Public Relations and that PR has many different theories.
Public Relations has usually been confused with marketing and advertising. It is essential to understand that while both PR and marketing have overlapping areas, they are still separate entities. PR however can be used to compliment certain aspects for marketing like for example in media strategy and promotions. It is also important to study the various key roles of a Public Relations practitioner. It is not just restricted to press agentry and publicity, but also includes other more diverse roles like events management, crisis management and fund raising.
The readings made me think more about public relations theory in that the theory is very diverse and covers a wide range of perspectives, which allows students a more complete view of PR and helps us understand PR better. One theory I find particularly interesting is Grunig's four models, which describes four different approaches that PR can take. In my opinion, I agree with Grunig and Hunt that the two-way symmetric is probably the ideal for PR. However, I also agree with the criticism that the two-way symmetric model is too idealistic for it to be fully applied in real life. The purpose for any organisation would be to get as much profit as possible and they are more likely to promote their own views than give the publics' views the same importance as theirs.
Monday, January 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Hi, i think its good that you start off your PR blog, or career, knowing the definition of PR and what the job scope encompasses.
However, i dont really agree with your last point about "the purpose of any organisation would be to get as much profit as possible." To much extent this is true, but i hope when you one day have your own PR company you'll think not only of monetary returns but also of giving back to charity!
(:
In general, the purpose of most business is to earn money...I guess to say 'any organisation' would be a bit too general. I would still stick to my point that they are more likely to promote their own views though...
Yes i would agree, but it'd be good to not be deluded primarily with profits. This is where ethics comes in too.
Post a Comment